Home » Uncategorized » Matriarchies existed (and still exist!)

Matriarchies existed (and still exist!)

Men have got to stop making it so easy for me to pick apart their bullshit arguments if they don’t want to look like a complete ignoramus. I like to think there’s a lot of things I still have to learn but matriarchy? How do you not know this? Or is this the only book you read about it, dude?

Reply to Thomas Fulton’s review of The Chalice and the Blade:

“It is possible that the problem with western society is not that it has a male image of divinity but that it has a one-sided, gender-specific image of divinity.”

Funny, because these are exact the same thing. The one-sidedness we are experiencing IS a male image of deity. In fact, it is a complete reversal where instead of acknowledging the creative, life-giving powers of females and their ability to give birth, these were attributed to males, and a male god instead, making the females submissive, and any goddesses demonized. Don’t know anything of this strain of thought besides the Bible? Check out the spermo-Gnostics and the creation stories where a male god created the world with his ejaculate alone.

Gotta love how people support patriarchy of “might makes right” and “what doesn’t kill me, makes me stronger” philosophies (idolization of masculinity and inability to admit vulnerability and weakness) and have no problem with a male god but when there’s talk about matriarchal/egalitarian societies suddenly “balance” is needed. Men imagine that women will treat men exactly like men have been treating women. Like those societies weren’t/aren’t egalitarian! Is this a situation where you read this one book on the subject and made such a conclusion? Please read up on matriarchal societies in the world, like the Trobriands, even described in Wilhelm Reich’s book The Function of the Orgasm. Look at what Russell Means had to say about matriarchy (available as a youtube video). There are still some matriarchal societies left to this day!

Relevant: Patriarchy as negation of matriarchy – Matriarchal communities around the worldMatriarchal societiesThe Igbo case – Matriarchy – Bonobo societies – The Keekorok baboon troop

“As early as 1926, Malinowski contested in one of his publications the biological nature of the sexual conflict between child and parent (the Oedipus conflict) discovered by Freud. He was right in contending that the relationship between children and parents changes with social processes; that it was, therefore, of a sociological and not biological nature. In short, the family in which the child grows up s itself the result of social development. Among the Trobrianders, for example, it is not the father but the brother of the child’s mother who determines how the child should be brought up. This was an important characteristic of matriarchy. The father plays only the role of a friend to his children. The Oedipus complex of the Europeans does not exist among the Trobrianders.”
— p. 229 The Function of the Orgasm by Wilhelm Reich
Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Matriarchies existed (and still exist!)

  1. Reblogged this on Your god is a fraud and commented:

    From my other blog. There are 2 views that matriarchy opposers commonly take: 1.) That matriarchies never existed, and 2.) That no matriarchies exist today. The first one supports the “patriarchy is a normal and natural way of life view” and the second allows them to inaccurately theorize that matriarchies were “just as bad” or were really “female supremacist” and “primitive” and other such nonsense (i.e., that it was patriarchy that brought “real” civilization and progress).

  2. Pingback: Revisiting matriarchy: What is it like? | Your social constructs are showing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s